Re: ACL Extensions

From: Anthony Rumble <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 1996 10:40:47 +1000 (EST)

> >2.) Excluding sites per PICS (http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/PICS)
> > Platform for Internet Content Selection. Many sites on the net
> >already include PICS headers and it would be valuable to be able to
> >exclude based on this information.
>
> I'd never heard of PICS before. Sounds great, but after reading the
> 15 minute version its not clear to me how it works in a proxy.
> Will require some more investigation....

In a nutshell.. there are two ways of handling PICS..

1. PICS header in a HTTP file
   Each page has a META header with the PICS information
   contained in it. I would imagine that the adminstrator
   of the proxy cache would set some arbitary level as the
   higest level of ratings allowed to pass through the cache

2. Using a third party rating..

   This is where, for each URL the web browser/cache wishes to
   fetch, it first sends off a request for the rating of that
   URL from a third party site..
   Slow.. but a more controlled situation than above..

There IS C code around on the PICS pages for loading
PICS files and doing the access control

-- 
Anthony Rumble - aka SmilieZ
Mobile 015-955-042 Pager 016-634-997
Geek code v3.1: GAT d-- s++:+++ a-- C++++ UL++++$ P+++++$ L+++++$
E--- W+++$ N++ o K++ w--- O---- M-- V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP++ t+++ 5++
X++++ R tv+ b++ DI+++++ D++ G+ e h--- r++ y+
Home Page/PGP key http://www.infotainment.com.au/smiliez/
Received on Sat Jul 06 1996 - 17:41:53 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:32:35 MST