Err... decompressed for transmission?
It would be better to compress for transmission and store uncompressed (or
even compressed).. basically the important bit is to save on bandwidth..
after all - regardless of the CPU hit, it's *much* cheaper to get more RAM
and CPU in the long run..
--Umar
> ZLIB is the obvious thing to use. At it's simplest, a cache item could be compressed
> before storage, and decompressed for transmission.
Received on Mon Nov 24 1997 - 01:02:31 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:37:42 MST