Re: Squid to two Proxy's ...

From: Edwin Culp <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 1998 08:44:39 -0600

Extraordinary, as always, Thank you. Don't you think that should be
included in the squid.conf?

Thanks Again

ed

Dancer wrote:
>
> Alright:
>
> # Allowing or denying direct connection to sites based on access lists.
> # This comes in two flavours. always_direct and never_direct
> #
> # allow_direct allow|deny [!]aclname
> #
> # If aclname matches and the rule is 'allow', then squid is permitted to
> make direct
> # connection to the target. If no allow_direct lines are present, then
> the default is
> # to use the neighbour-selection algorithm, as defined elsewhere in this
> configuration.
> # Rules are matched top-to-bottom (ie: Earlier rules take precedence over
> later ones)
> # If there is at least one allow_direct line, an implicit rule is created
> at the end that is
> # the opposite of the last explicitly stated line (deny if you said
> allow, allow if you said
> # deny [someone check me on this - Dancer]). If allow_direct rules exist
> and there is
> # no allow line matching the current request, the request must go through
> a neighbour
> # or a parent _regardless_ of other selection criteria.
> # The default is to use the neighbour selection criteria defined
> elsewhere in this config
> #
> #always_direct allow all
> #
> # never_direct allow|deny [!]aclname
> #
> # Never direct works identically to allow direct but the sense of allow
> and deny are reversed.
> # ('never_direct allow all' means 'always use parents or neighbours for
> every request,
> # and if it is not possible to do so, generate an error).
> #
> # The default is to use the neighbour selection criteria defined
> elsewhere in this config.
> #never_direct deny all
>
> I've had a few too many drinks this-eve with the boss. This explanation
> is the best I can do before a meal and coffee. Hope it helps.
>
> D
>
> Edwin Culp wrote:
>
> > Daniel Flinkmann wrote:
> > >
> > > This would also not work.
> > >
> > > I found the wrong config.
> > >
> > > I have to change to the following:
> > >
> > > never_direct allow all
> >
> > I think a lot of us get stuck here. Couldn't someone add an
> > example to the squid.conf to replace the XXX that it has?
> > I would be glad to do it if someone will direct me as to
> > the change procedures.
> >
> > Another place where I and from what I have seen on the list
> > is with round-robin as suggested below.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > then everything work via the proxy :-)
> > >
> > > Daniel
> > >
> > >
> > MUNCH
> > >
> > > if you have more than one parent, then 'single_parent_bypass' is
> > > meaningless.
> > >
> > > You probably want to use round-robin.
> > >
> > > cache_host foo parent 3128 3130 round-robin
> > > cache_host bar parent 3128 3130 round-robin
> > >
> > > Duane W.
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> > Has anyone been able to get round-robin to distribute load. I tried
> > most of the day yesterday and it would use the first parent only.
> > It doesn't seem to be doing what it says in distribute the load
> > to the parent that has been consulted less.
> >
> > I was trying 1.2beta14 yesterday, but have tried almost all and have
> > never been successful.
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > ed
>
> --
> Did you read the documentation AND the FAQ?
> If not, I'll probably still answer your question, but my patience will
> be limited, and you take the risk of sarcasm and ridicule.
Received on Mon Feb 09 1998 - 06:40:07 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:38:49 MST