George Michaelson wrote:
> We've come up with a scheme to re-use the objects in the cache
> explicitly from the cache. It depends on exposing the hash function
> from the URL so a client can put in a GET cache_object: request in
> some efficient manner to let the cache send back the specific object.
>
> This has some 'social engineering' consequences, like bypassing the
> cookie and other access control on the real object. None-the-less,
> the data is in the cache, its known to be in the cache, and it could
> be bloody useful to be able to 'see' it direct from the cache.
This kind of operation is already defined in HTTP 1.1.
Cache-Control: only-if-cached
RFC 2068, section 14.9 (Cache-Control:)
In some cases, such as times of extremely poor network connectivity,
a client may want a cache to return only those responses that it
currently has stored, and not to reload or revalidate with the origin
server. To do this, the client may include the only-if-cached
directive in a request. If it receives this directive, a cache SHOULD
either respond using a cached entry that is consistent with the other
constraints of the request, or respond with a 504 (Gateway Timeout)
status. However, if a group of caches is being operated as a unified
system with good internal connectivity, such a request MAY be
forwarded within that group of caches.
I don't think this is implemented in Squid yet, but it should be quite
trivial to implement.. ;-)
--- Henrik Nordstr�m Sparetime Squid HackerReceived on Thu Mar 19 1998 - 15:05:06 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:39:25 MST