Re: Mozilla Expires: 'correctness' checks?

Bill Wichers wrote:
>
> On Fri, 1 May 1998, David J N Begley wrote:
>
> Actually, when used in conjunction with a good directory tree for the
> website, the image size tags can improve the apparent load speed of a
> page. Users like to be able to start reading the page immediatly, and
> image sized tags generally allow the textual information to be rendered by
> the browser before the pages images have been transferred.
>
> I wasn't aware that the Netscape sources had become available yet. I
> thought they were going to wait until they had Navigator 5.0 at some
> magic point in development. Does it look like any of the list's "dream
> features" will be able to be easily implemented or modified to work
> "correctly"? Netscape has all kinds of quirks in its handling of IMS stuff
> right now. Any user of MRTG will attest to this...

www.mozilla.org

I ran across it quite by accident. I was under the same impression up
until then. It's certainly tempting me to do a slightly customised
version with the local ISP name in it, and some correctness fixes for
cache-friendliness.

D

-- 
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GAT d- s++: a C++++$ UL++++B+++S+++C++H++U++V+++$ P+++$ L+++ E-
W+++(--)$ N++ w++$>--- t+ 5++ X+() R+ tv b++++ DI+++ e- h-@ 
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------