Re: Again: squid 2.1PATCH2 very slow in comparison with squid 1.1.20

From: Irfan Akber <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 14:44:37 -0000

Could be FreeBSD related issue. I am running Squid2.1.PATCH2 on Linux and
works very good.

Irfan Akber

----------
> From: Stanley.Hopcroft@ipaustralia.gov.au
> To: squid-users@ircache.net
> Subject: Again: squid 2.1PATCH2 very slow in comparison with squid 1.1.20
> Date: Thursday, February 18, 1999 7:28 AM
>
>
>
> Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,
>
> My employer is a very happy user of Squid 1.1.20 on a modest system
(FreeBSD
> 2.2.8-RELEASE, 128 MB, P5 class processor).
>
> The new version, 2.1PATCH2, performs very badly in comparison with 1.1.20
on
> this system. Pages appear to half load and then there is a wait for up to
 a
> minute until the page is "done".
> >From a browser point of view both no cache and squid 1.1.20 get pages
much
> faster than 2.1.
>
> Some details are
>
> . no tweaking of the configure script (apart friom --perfix)
> . same results with cache_mem 20 MB as 60 MB
> . no parent cache (no ICP)
> . no delay Pool use
> . same results with or without NCSA auth (Web client is Apache).
> . AFAIK (configure.status) shows no thread usage
>
> Also, the network utilisation when 2.1PATCH2 is running is much less than
with
> 1.1.20. It seems like 2.1 is simply not asking for pages as fast as
1.1.20.
>
> Your comments will be gratefully received.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Yours sincerely
>
> S Hopcroft
> IP Australia
>
> IP Australia is the Australian government agency entrusted with granting
rights
> to
> "Intellectual Property" such as Patents, Trade-Marks and Designs.
>
>
>
>
Received on Thu Feb 18 1999 - 02:45:45 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:44:36 MST