Re: entry in access.log < entry in store.log ?

Friday wrote:
>
> At 02:38 PM 1999/5/10 +0200, you wrote:
> >access.log will contain entries with no match in store.log (cache hits
> >or ICP queries), and store.log will contain entries with no match in
> >access.log (removal of cached objects). There is no 1<->1 relation
> >between access.log and store.log.
>
> Does it imply that removal of an cached object in store.log doesn't need an
> entry appear in access.log??

Removals only appear in store.log

Cache hits does only appear in access.log.

> But the fact that, the object in store.log must be previously logged
> in access.log when other clients access it.

Yes, theoretically, but that could have been ages ago depending on cache
size and usage.

There are also Squid internal objects in the store which never appears
in access.log. Examples of this is digests, netdb databases and icons.

--
Henrik Nordstrom
Spare time Squid hacker