David Malone wrote:
> Hmmm - so that means that a group of peers who want to enforce a peer
> relationship must all have the same max-ages? Otherwise miss_access is
> useless for enforcing peer relationships?
miss_access is utterly useless unless all peers are Squid 2.2 or later.
There will always be a certain amount of false hits, and when on Squid
2.1 or earlier peer the access denial message generated by miss_access
will be sent to the end user. The recommended use of miss_access untill
all peers is Squid 2.2 or later is to only deny miss access to siblings
which appears to try to use you as a parent. Squid 2.2 siblings will
automatically enforse miss_access deny equivalence on their requests by
using the only-if-cached HTTP option regardless of what your miss_access
is set to.
-- Henrik Nordstrom Spare time Squid hackerReceived on Fri May 28 1999 - 14:04:03 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:46:29 MST