Re: Squid / Transparent cache killing Cisco cpu

From: tom minchin <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 21:32:04 +1000

On a tangent subject, we're having problems implementing Alteon's Acedirector2
(the Acedirector 180 works great, just overkill for cluster of Squid caches).
Every now and again (well, every few days) all servers in a server group lose
their routing (they don't have an ARP entry for the Alteon). It doesn't happen
on the 180, just 2's - the reseller is helpful but not able to figure it
out and Alteon has taken the Netscape support model (dead silence).

The 2's have really poor performance too - whereas the 180 works great.

Has anyone seen this kind of problem?

tom@interact.net.au

On Tue, Jun 15, 1999 at 08:00:06PM +1000, Dancer wrote:
>
> Agreed. We have some alteon layer-4 switches. A nice piece of kit, though they don't really scale beyond 256 servers very well.
>
> D
>
> Stephen Baxter wrote:
> >
> > Brad,
> >
> > Have a look at ip route-cache policy under the interface config of your
> > router. This may help some but in the end doing transparent proxy on a
> > router does not scale all that well.
> >
> > Have a look at some layer 4 switches - they are very impressive !
> >
Received on Tue Jun 15 1999 - 05:37:58 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:46:53 MST