Re: Redirection based on ACL?

From: Jonathan Hall <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 21:59:54 -0600

That sounds reasonable. I'll see about setting that up this evening.

Thanks!

On Wed, Jan 05, 2000 at 08:29:09AM -1000, Clifton Royston wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 08:27:14PM -0600, Jonathan Hall wrote:
> > I wish to use Ad Zapper, but don't want to force all users to use it if they
> > don't want it.
> >
> > Is it possible to use a url redirector only for certian ACLs? And if so...
> > how is it done, or where do I find documentation to explain such?
> >
> > Thanks!
>
> A simple alternative may be to run Squid with Adzapper on a separate
> port number with the no_cache directive and Squid on the same machine
> but other port number as its parent.
>
> It works to run two instances of Squid on the same machine, and that
> way your users could choose for themself whether they want ads zapped
> by selecting which port they use on the proxy.
>
> -- Clifton
>
> --
> Clifton Royston -- LavaNet Systems Architect -- cliftonr@lava.net
> "An absolute monarch would be absolutely wise and good.
> But no man is strong enough to have no interest.
> Therefore the best king would be Pure Chance.
> It is Pure Chance that rules the Universe;
> therefore, and only therefore, life is good." - AC

--
Famous last words: "Why yes--a bulletproof vest." -- James Rodges, murderer,
on his final request before the firing squad
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
  Jonathan Hall  *  jonhall@futureks.net  *  PGP public key available
 Systems Admin, Future Internet Services; Goessel, KS * (316) 367-2487
         http://www.futureks.net  *  PGP Key ID: FE 00 FD 51
                  -=  Running Debian GNU/Linux  =-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Received on Wed Jan 05 2000 - 21:07:07 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:50:14 MST