Re: Anyone comments authenticating to NT?

From: Sean Humphries <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 14:34:13 -0600

I have used smb_auth for a few weeks now and have had good results. I force
it to go where I want with the -W and -U flags so it is pretty quick (the
pdc is on the same lan segment). Right now it seems to be and all or none
scenario but that's ok (I was hoping to have different degrees of access by
group). e-mail if I can help you more.
Sean
----- Original Message -----
From: "Drenning Bruce" <bdrenni@catholicrelief.org>
To: <squid-users@ircache.net>
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 2:21 PM
Subject: Anyone comments authenticating to NT?

>
>
> We have an NT firewall. It works OK except the web proxy is too
unreliable.
> We have to restart the service daily. After some troubleshooting, I
believe
> the main problem is that is doesn't deal well with our requirement for
user
> authorization. I am using the NT domain for authentication.
>
> In light of this, and the fact I have a couple of linux boxes for
> file/print
> already running, I thought I could set up Squid on one of them and then
> deny
> web proxy to all IP addresses but the Squid server. Can anyone comment on
> the reliability of smb_auth with squid? We only have about 250 users.
> Averaging 6 - 8 concurrent http connections.
>
Received on Thu Jan 13 2000 - 13:44:21 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:50:22 MST