RE: [SQU] 2.4.PRE

On 14 Feb 2001 13:09:56 +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>
> Yes. CVS is just the storage place for the source code. When you get a
> tarball, it s just a fresh copy of whats in CVS.
>
> CVS allows storage of simultaneous revisions of each file, these
> revisions can be "branches" (allowing development), or just "tags" to
> mark a good version.

Yes, i know what CVS is all about. I was asking only if the usual
current CVS version is "clean" enough.

> The branch SQUID_2_4 will only change if a bugfix is released for squid
> 2.4 - so it's a safe bet to use that branch.
>
> Tracking something like HEAD _is dangerous_ because thats where
> development takes place, and we get to break things every now and then.

Ok, this is the information i needed.

Thanks,

-- 
Florin Andrei
--
To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html