Martin A. Brooks wrote:
> IMHO, 2.4 is not yet stable enough to be used on production systems. Hell,
> even 2.2 is still a bit flaky :)
I find Linux 2.4 to be quite stable, when you find the suitable hardware
to run it on.. (still problems with certain very common network card
drivers, certain SCSI boards and such never-ending issues...)
-- Henrik Nordstrom Squid hacker -- To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.htmlReceived on Mon Feb 26 2001 - 14:51:14 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:58:12 MST