RE: [squid-users] price/performance

From: Andre van Zyl <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 10:58:03 +0200

The costs shown are not for the software only. These figures are the total
cost of the entire "solution" entered, and so include costs for the server
hardware, switches and/or routers, as well as the software and OS. See
section 8: Product configurations to see the exact breakdown of each entry.

AD.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kareem Mahgoub [mailto:kashraf@thewayout.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:45 AM
> To: Vivek Sadananda Pai; squid-users@squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] price/performance
>
>
> Just wondering
> Is this an advertisement for Microsoft?!:)
> theoretically squid must be the higher one as price = 0 $
> so Hit rate / Price = infinity
> thanks
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Vivek Sadananda Pai" <vivek@imimic.com>
> To: <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 12:51 AM
> Subject: [squid-users] price/performance
>
>
> > Disclaimer: I work for a caching company
> >
> > Someone was asking about price/performance. Here are the
> price/performance
> > links for the last cacheoff. The Squid entries are in black.
> >
> > price/performance by cache hits
> >
> http://www.measurement-factory.com/results/public/cacheoff/N03/aut
> o/all/hit.
> rate_price.ratio.html
> >
> > price/performance by hits+misses
> >
> http://www.measurement-factory.com/results/public/cacheoff/N03/aut
> o/all/rep.
> rate_price.ratio.html
> >
> > The last polygraph results for CacheFlow are at
> > http://polygraph.ircache.net/Results/dcomm-1.cacheflow/
> > However, I'd be surprised if CacheFlow can still get
> > anyone to pay those prices :-)
> >
> > -Vivek
> >
>
>
Received on Tue Nov 13 2001 - 02:11:17 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:04:09 MST