On Wed, 14 Nov 2001 richard.kelly@centrelink.gov.au wrote:
> Your first guess was correct, I had accidently removed one of the
> content options. It just caught me out because the same workload
> was caching with another proxy (BorderManager) but not with squid.
>
> Any idea what would cause squid to vary largely in response rates?
> Using a simple workload I was getting around 5000 responses a sec
> initially, but running the same test the next day I was getting
> only ~180/sec. CPU / memory usage seems to be fine, and there is
> plenty of room in the cache. There doesn't seem to be anything
> unusual in the logs either.
If you mean simple.pg workload, it cannot be used to produce any
useful performance measurements. I do not think Squid can produce 5000
req/sec on any reasonable (especially forward-caching) workload.
Alex.
Received on Tue Nov 13 2001 - 17:22:55 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:04:11 MST