RE: [squid-users] FreeBSD :Diskd ? (WAS: Compile Crash)

This may be a bit off-topic, but for the BSDs, soft-updates is *highly*
preferred over async, as it's neck-and-neck in speed, and guarantees state
of the drive.

Aaron

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Raven [mailto:dave@reason.za.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 12:10 PM
> To: Henrik Nordstrom; squid-users@squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] FreeBSD :Diskd ? (WAS: Compile Crash)
>
>
> Thanks Henrik,
>
> Thats something I've been interested in, but never sure of.
> What advantages might diskd have?
>
> I use one cache drive:
> from mount:
> /dev/ad1s1e on /mnt/cache (ufs, local, noatime, noexec, nosuid,
> soft-updates)
>
> from fstab:
> /dev/ad1s1e /mnt/cache ufs rw,noexec,nosuid,async,noatime
> 2 2
>
> I run aufs with squid (obviously). What might I need to
> change to switch to
> diskd?
> And how would it be faster?
>
> Any reading material or suggestions on what others have found would be
> welcome.
>
>
> TIA
> Dave
> OpteqSec.
>
>
Received on Wed Dec 19 2001 - 16:02:44 MST