Re: [squid-users] Which squid to use?

ChrisHoover@safety-kleen.com wrote:

> I was just doing more reading on squid and ran across this statement in the
> high performance web caching with squid
> (http://www.swelltech.com/pengies/joe/squidtuneup/t1.html):
>
> First, squid-2.3.STABLE4 is not as stable as 2.2.STABLE5+Henrik's patches.
> Second, squid-2.3.STABLE4 is not as fast as squid-2.2.STABLE5+Henrik's
> patches.
>
> Is this still true?

Yep. It's still true that 2.3STABLE4 is neither as stable or fast as
2.2STABLE5+hno. ;-)

Seriously though, Squid 2.4STABLE3 is pretty good, and what I'm
deploying today. 2.2STABLE5+hno is still faster, and more stable in
most environments, as well...but none the less the feature set of
2.4STABLE3 is enough better that it's worth giving up a little speed.

-- 
Joe Cooper <joe@swelltech.com>
http://www.swelltech.com
Web Caching Appliances and Support