Re: [squid-users] huge downloads fail

The one waiting needs to have a higher timeout..

Regards
Henrik

Van Bossche Koen wrote:
> Thanks Henrik for pointing me to that.
> On trend there also is a parameter called 'DEAD TIME'.
>
> regards,
> ./koen
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:hno@squid-cache.org]
> Sent: 18 April 2002 18:52
> To: Van Bossche Koen
> Cc: 'squid-users@squid-cache.org'
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] huge downloads fail
>
>
> Have you increased the timeout in Squid?
>
> read_timeout
>
> The read_timeout is applied on server-side connections. After
> each successful read(), the timeout will be extended by this
> amount. If no data is read again after this amount of time,
> the request is aborted and logged with ERR_READ_TIMEOUT. The
> default is 15 minutes.
>
> Regards
> Henrik
>
> Van Bossche Koen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have some problems doing huge downloads (i.e 50 or 60Mb files). We have
> > our proxy (squidPRE2.5) installed with Trend Interscan, Trend first does
>
> the
>
> > download and then forwards it to squid. For the user, trend does not give
> > any information and it thinks its hanging. However even if the user does
>
> not
>
> > interrupt, the download often breaks.
> > Seems that Trend does not do its job very well.
> > Does anyone know a solution to bypass that problem? Also I have
> > configured FWTK, since Trend is in front it is the same behaviour.
> >
> > regards,
> > ./koen
Received on Fri Apr 19 2002 - 02:39:40 MDT