RE: [squid-users] aufs problems in 2.5STABLE1

From: Lightfoot.Michael <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 11:41:08 +1000

 
> It might be. It's not likely though, that code is very little
> changed between 2.4 and 2.5.
>
Yes, that I gathered from my last experience with squid (2 years ago.)

> What does squid show when you run 'squid -v' (the configure options)
>
Hmmm. As this was meant to be a functional test server I probably
didn't configure enough threads for async-io (I'm too embarassed to say
how many <G>.) I might try again with 128 threads - more what I would
have in production, or is that still too low? We only have 350 users
total so the proxy load will not get much above 10 per second (I haven't
checked what our current Nutscrape is doing - partly 'cos I don't know
where to look.)

Incidentally, does anyone have an opinion on the use of async i/o on
Solaris 2.6 and 7 (and solaris 8 & 9 when I get approval to upgrade)
verses using diskd?

Michael Lightfoot
Unix Consultant
ISG Host Systems
Comcare
+61 2 62750680
Apologies for the rubbish which follows...

--------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTICE: This e-mail message and attachments may contain confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient you should not use or
disclose any information in the message or attachments. If received in
error, please notify the sender by return email immediately. Comcare
does not waive any confidentiality or privilege.

Comcare's Canberra and Melbourne offices have moved to new premises.

We hope this notice makes it easier for you to update your records.
 
New street addresses:
 
Canberra office
Level 1
14 Moore street
CANBERRA CITY ACT 2601

Melbourne Office
Level 2
121 William Street
MELBOURNE VIC 3001
Claims Fax Number 03 9620 4721

Please call Comcare on 1300 366 979 if you have any queries.
Received on Thu Oct 17 2002 - 19:41:12 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:10:44 MST