Re: [squid-users] Question on aufs

Wei Keong wrote:
>
> > Wei Keong wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Marc,
> > >
> > > The storeAufsOpenDone keep appearing in cache log... not sure if it's a
> > > time bomb waiting to fail :(
> > >
> > > Notice that the aufs source files (src/fs/aufs) are quite some time ago,
> > > and there are some changes in 2.5.
> > >
> > > > aiops.c,v 1.4.2.3 2001/01/12 00:52:00 wessels Exp $
> > > > async_io.c,v 1.6.2.2 2001/01/12 00:52:00 wessels Exp $
> > > > store_dir_aufs.c,v 1.16.2.12 2001/07/11 22:31:07 hno Exp $
> > >
> > > Do you think is a good idea to patch the aufs with the 2.5 source?
> >
> > I am not sure what you mean, using 2.5s1 would imply using the
> > latest stable source, I guess.
> >
> > M.
>
> I mean get the 2.5S1 aufs source files (src/fs/aufs), diff with 2.4S6
> source and modify the relavent codes accordingly... not sure if this will
> work...
>

 Why don't you upgrade to 2.5S1 ?

 M.

> >
> >
> >
> > > If so, what are the files I should patch?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Wei Keong
> > >
> > > On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Marc Elsen wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Wei Keong wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Sorry... forgot about the standard info.
> > > > >
> > > > > squid 2.4 S6
> > > > > os redhat 7.3 kernel 2.4.19
> > > > >
> > > > > The moment i pump traffic (80 req/s) to the box, these messenges floods
> > > > > the cache log.
> > > > >
> > > > > Did i miss out something while creating the cache dir (squid -z)?
> > > >
> > > > I don't think so. Perhap's it's possible in aufs that SQUID can
> > > > access objects which have been deleted in another thread.
> > > > So store I/O management may not be 100% aufs save for certain
> > > > operations related to object handling.
> > > >
> > > > M.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Wei Keong
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Marc Elsen wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Wei Keong wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Has anyone seen this in cache log?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2002/10/24 17:04:58| storeAufsOpenDone: (2) No such file or directory
> > > > > > > 2002/10/24 17:04:58| /usr/local/squid/cache2/00/18/00001864
> > > > > > > 2002/10/24 17:04:58| storeAufsOpenDone: (2) No such file or directory
> > > > > > > 2002/10/24 17:04:58| /usr/local/squid/cache1/00/11/00001134
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Here's the config
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ./configure --enable-cache-digests --enable-gnuregex --enable-underscores
> > > > > > > --enable-async-io=50
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Here's the cache_dir
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > cache_dir aufs /usr/local/squid/cache2 15360 16 256
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Wei Keong
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Squid version ?
> > > > > > OS/platform/version ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Anyway, I get it too although rare, in 2.5S1 on Redhat 6.2
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 'Time is a consequence of Matter thus
> > > > > > General Relativity is a direct consequence of QM
> > > > > > (M.E. Mar 2002)
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > 'Time is a consequence of Matter thus
> > > > General Relativity is a direct consequence of QM
> > > > (M.E. Mar 2002)
> > > >
> >
> > --
> >
> > 'Time is a consequence of Matter thus
> > General Relativity is a direct consequence of QM
> > (M.E. Mar 2002)
> >

-- 
 'Time is a consequence of Matter thus
 General Relativity is a direct consequence of QM
 (M.E. Mar 2002)