On Sunday 27 October 2002 16:20, Marc Elsen wrote:
> Using 'top' can you SQUID's mem usage ?
> Especially compare SIZE versus RSS,is there any significant difference
Squids primary process SIZE and RSS is exactly 1148. There's only little
difference between SIZE and RSS on all children. SIZE is 5804 and RSS is
5784.
> Check SQUID's cache.log for possible error messages during
> normal operation.
Nothing stands out.
> Check 'dmesg' on Linux ; watch for suspicous error messages,if any.
> Check /var/log/messages on Linux, idem ditto.
None either.
> Check 'netstat -i' ; watch for error counters.
Watched it for about a minute while stressing squid. 0 errors on all ifs in
both directions.
> Check 'netstat -a' , TCP connections should not be in suspicous
> states.
Seems okay. Anything in particulair?
Just tried requesting a large file (30MB) through squid on localhost. It also
only transfers about 200-250 KB/s. Tried increasing squids priority to max
without any significant change. It doesn't look like the harddisk could be
the bottleneck since there's almost no HD activity while xfering.
-- Regards, Tais M. Hansen OSDReceived on Sun Oct 27 2002 - 09:01:01 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:10:55 MST