Re: [squid-users] Problem compiling squid 2.5stable1

From: Henrik Nordstrom <[email protected]>
Date: 07 Nov 2002 16:00:02 +0100

Hmm.. my first guess is that you do not have the required kernel headers
installed, needed for application development.

Check that you have /usr/include/linux/ and /usr/include/asm/ and that
there is lots of files in each...

Regards
Henrik

tor 2002-11-07 klockan 11.30 skrev Victor Tsang:
> While I test compiling squid 2.5 stable1 in one of our older redhat box,
> I encounter the following error.
>
>
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../include -I. -I../../include
> -I../../include -I../../src/ -g -O2 -Wall -c -o ufs/store_dir_ufs.o
> `test -f ufs/store_dir_ufs.c || echo './'`ufs/store_dir_ufs.c
> ufs/store_dir_ufs.c: In function `storeUfsDirGetNextFile':
> ufs/store_dir_ufs.c:727: `ENOENT' undeclared (first use in this
> function)
> ufs/store_dir_ufs.c:727: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only
> once
> ufs/store_dir_ufs.c:727: for each function it appears in.)
> ufs/store_dir_ufs.c: In function `storeUfsDirClean':
> ufs/store_dir_ufs.c:1172: `ENOENT' undeclared (first use in this
> function)
> make[4]: *** [ufs/store_dir_ufs.o] Error 1
> make[4]: Leaving directory
> `/usr/local/src/temp/squid-2.5.STABLE1-20021107/src/fs'
> make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[3]: Leaving directory
> `/usr/local/src/temp/squid-2.5.STABLE1-20021107/src/fs'
> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory
> `/usr/local/src/temp/squid-2.5.STABLE1-20021107/src'
> make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory
> `/usr/local/src/temp/squid-2.5.STABLE1-20021107/src'
> make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>
>
> - This is Redhat 6.2 box running 2.4.18 kernel
>
> - I didn't switch on any option at configure (ie. I did a configure and
> then make)
>
> - I have tried this with the package squid-2.5.STABLE1.tar.gz and
> squid-2.5.STABLE1-20021107.tar.gz, both end up with the same errror
>
> - Tried the same setup in a Redhat 7.2 box and everything works just
> fine.
>
>
> Anyone have idea if there's a fix to this problem without upgrading the
> box?
>
>
> Many thanks.
>
> Victor
Received on Thu Nov 07 2002 - 07:59:27 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:11:12 MST