Re: [squid-users] diskd performs badly

aufs is fastest on Linux, but diskd can do a pretty good job as well.

diskd is fastest on FreeBSD. aufs do not work good at all on FreeBSD.

Regards
Henrik

tor 2002-11-07 klockan 16.34 skrev Edward D. Millington:
> Hi Henrik!
>
> I thought that DiskD was the fastest of all 3 fs on Linux.
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> Best regards
>
> Edward Millington
> BSc, Network+, I-Net+, CIW Associate
> Systems Administrator, Sr
> Cariaccess Communications Ltd.
> Palm Plaza
> Wildey
> St. Michael
> Barbados
>
> Phone: 1 246 430 7435
> Mobile: 1 246 234 6278
> Fax: 1 246 431 0170
>
> edward@cariaccess.com
> www.cariaccess.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@squid-cache.org>
> To: Fabien Salvi <fabien@cri74.org>
> Cc: Squid User <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
> Date: 07 Nov 2002 16:01:53 +0100
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] diskd performs badly
>
> > You might want to consider trying the aufs cache_dir type. Generally
> > faster than diskd on Linux and less configuration needed.
> >
> > Regards
> > Henrik
> >
> >
> > tor 2002-11-07 klockan 11.42 skrev Fabien Salvi:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I'm using squid 2.4.STABLE6 on linux (Debian woody) with kernel
> > 2.4.19
> > > SMP
> > > Server is a dual PIII 1Ghz with 1GB RAM and ICP-Vortex RAID card
> > and
> > > U160 36GB SCSI IBM hard disks.
> > >
> > > I've tried ufs and diskd cache_dir.
Received on Thu Nov 07 2002 - 10:34:02 MST