tor 2002-11-07 klockan 16.22 skrev Fabien Salvi:
> I've just tried aufs, but I obtain same bad perfs as diskd, aroud 200
> KB/s
What test are you performing?
> But, maybe aufs or diskd support better high load (> 60 req/s) than ufs
> while throughput stay low...
It is true that aufs/diskd will be somewhat slower than "ufs" on low
loads, but they are both capable of handling significantly higher loads
than "ufs".
Regards
Henrik
Received on Thu Nov 07 2002 - 10:40:54 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:11:13 MST