On Tuesday 25 February 2003 09.27, Marc Elsen wrote:
> It's not a real bug , I think and following discussions in the
> past more due to the nature of the aio mechanisms ,following subtle
> issues where a file can be deleted which is needed for opening or
> reading in another thread.
Corect.
> Maybe one could state that aio is not 'cache safe', but the thing
> is that squid will fetch the object again from the remote
> webserver.
The aufs cache is safe. It is only that Squid may at times of high
load fail to keep some of it's cached objects without knowing the
object have vanished from the cache. The same thing can happen for
any of the cache_dir types but is slightly more noticeable with aufs.
> The intend of course being that these messages should be rather
> infrequent.
True.
Regards
Henrik
Received on Tue Feb 25 2003 - 02:35:46 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:13:36 MST