Re: [squid-users] windows updates

From: Rodney Richison <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 17:28:40 -0600

Is a fresh default install. Other than transparent. I get the feeling it's
related to the certificate windows update first installs. Any way to tell
squid not to cache that, but cache the updates?

Highest Regards,

Rodney
www.rcrnet.net
918-358-1111
----- Original Message -----
From: "Karl Pielorz" <kpielorz@tdx.co.uk>
To: "Rodney Richison" <rodney@rcrcomputing.com>; "squid-users@squid-cache"
<squid-users@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] windows updates

>
>
> --On 25 February 2003 14:38 -0600 Rodney Richison
<rodney@rcrcomputing.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Windows updates behind transparent proxy keeps saying no updates
> > available, yet when I enter the proxy settings manually in "lan
> > settings", the update comes right away. Fix?
> >
> > Highest Regards,
> >
> > Rodney
>
> I've noticed a 'similar' thing here - going to the Windows Update page
> takes ages, and you finally get a "You need a new component to scan for
> updates" - which you elect to download (and it takes ages) - only to throw
> you back to "You need a new component to scan for updates" [ad infinitum].
> Turn the proxy off, and it's an order of magnitude quicker, and you don't
> get caught in the loop.
>
> Knowing our setup here, I'd guess it's over anonimity by the proxy - so
I'm
> going to make sure theres no headers being stripped by Squid that perhaps
> should be there (or at least try it when it's not removing anything) -
does
> your proxy strip anything out headers / anonimity wise?
>
> -Kp
>
>
Received on Tue Feb 25 2003 - 16:29:19 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:13:43 MST