Hello,
Quoting Henrik Nordstrom <hno@squid-cache.org>:
> On performance the ISA server probably wins.
What do you mean with 'perfomance'? Do you mean the speed for the end-user? Or
do you mean the resources (memory,cpu) that the proxy needs?
>
> Providing solid information on ROI and the like is not at all easy, as
> it entierly depends on your conditions.
>
> If you are a MS site with little or no knowledge in running UNIX type
> applications then ISA server will probably have a better ROI than Squid,
> unless you get bitten by licensing restrictions which increases the cost
> of running ISA server.
>
> If you do have experience of running UNIX type applications then Squid
> probably gives a better ROI in the long run, and gives a lot of benefit
> in flexibility.
Another -maybe small, but important for me- : Squid is 'open source'!
You can modify the program like you want......if there are any bugs, there al
almost immediately patches available....
And.......and......Squid has a good mailinglist :)
rgrds,
Bart
-- Schelstraete Bart [email protected] - http://www.schelstraete.org http://langmixer.mozdev.orgReceived on Tue Apr 15 2003 - 01:53:13 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:14:58 MST