On Friday 02 May 2003 11.51, Ahmad Masood Shah wrote:
> then what you suggest.. I think raid1 is much better for squid then
> all other with duplexing...
For best performance I suggest stand alone cache drives if it is
acceptable to restart Squid if one drive fails. This usually is
acceptable and can easily be done automatically by a system monitor
detectin a failed drive.
For a easy manageable system such as at a remote location with no good
technical people around or where a reboot is not acceptable to
replace a failed drive I propose hardware raid1+hotswap.
As entry level I propose a system with two IDE drives (one on each IDE
channel), using software raid1 for the OS + logs, and one plain
partition on each drive for cache. For medium maintainability place
the drives in cold swap drive bays.
Regards
Henrik
-- Donations welcome if you consider my Free Squid support helpful. https://www.paypal.com/xclick/business=hno%40squid-cache.org If you need commercial Squid support or cost effective Squid or firewall appliances please refer to MARA Systems AB, Sweden http://www.marasystems.com/, [email protected]Received on Fri May 02 2003 - 04:36:20 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:16:09 MST