Re: [squid-users] Squid being slow more than a direct connection

From: Sarky <[email protected]>
Date: 25 May 2003 13:34:45 +0100

Thanx for the comment, i have changed to diskd now and it is still slow
well i dont think it is the access of the disk.
for example when i click on www.cnn.com for example it does sending
request for about 10sec before it goes connecting and start fetching the
page.

Thank you
sarky
On Sun, 2003-05-25 at 00:09, Mauro wrote:
> > The second most common cause is improperly tuned Squid installation,
> > such as using the ufs cache_dir type on a high request rate Squid
> > proxy (trying to use the ufs cache_dir type for request rates above
> > 30 requests/s is not recommendable, use diskd or aufs instead)
>
> So in general it's better to use diskd or aufs?
> I am using ufs.
>
> Mauro
>
>
Received on Sun May 25 2003 - 06:33:23 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:17:01 MST