Re: [squid-users] CPU utilization performance issue

From: Tay Teck Wee <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2003 01:36:17 +0800 (CST)

Hi Bart,

I'm using reiserfs. aufs coz its more suitable for
linux.

--
Wolf
 --- Schelstraete Bart <bart@schelstraete.org> wrote:
> Hzllo,
> 
> Why not using Reiser instead of ext3 with diskd?
> I read a lot of articles that are saying that reiser
> is much fast for 
> Squid. (a lot of 'small files')
> 
> 
> 
> 
>        Bart
> 
> Zand, Nooshin wrote:
> 
> >Hi,
> >I am just wonder why you are not using diskd.
> >Based on Benchmarking that I read, diskd provides
> faster I/O performance.
> >I am planning to run squid on Linux Redhat 9.0 and
> thinking to use ext3 and diskd.
> >Thanks,
> >Nooshin
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Tay Teck Wee
> [mailto:wolfpacks01@yahoo.com.sg]
> >Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 2:22 AM
> >To: squid-users
> >Subject: Re: [squid-users] CPU utilization
> performance issue
> >
> >
> >Hi everyone,
> >
> >thanks for the input. The ACL list have since been
> >slightly altered, using only src(22 entries),
> >dstdomain(114 entries) and url_regex(20 entries). I
> am
> >currently on kernel 2.4.20-19.9 so the
> Hyperthreading
> >might hv been optimized. 
> >
> >Now the machine is handling about 110 req/s but
> again
> >the CPU will climb to abt 90-95%. Is it possible
> for
> >my squid box to go beyond 180 req/s, which is the
> peak
> >for each proxies in the existing pool(ISP env)? I
> am
> >trying to replace my existing NetCaches with
> >squids...one box for one box.  
> >
> >I am wondering if its because reiserfs will consume
> >more CPU than other fs like ext3? Will changing my
> >cache partitions to reiserf lower down the CPU
> usage?
> >Or can anyone suggest other possible improvements?
> >Thanks.
> >
> >my 3 caching partitions are on 3 separate disks:-
> >/dev/sdb1      /cdata1  reiserfs notail,noatime 1 2
> >/dev/sdc1      /cdata2  reiserfs notail,noatime 1 2
> >/dev/sdd1      /cdata3  reiserfs notail,noatime 1 2
> >
> >--
> >Wolf
> >
> > --- Tay Teck Wee <wolfpacks01@yahoo.com.sg> wrote:
> >
> >Hi,
> >  
> >
> >>when I'm getting about 90 req/s or 800 concurrent
> >>connection(according to my foundry L4) to my
> >>squid(RedHat 8.0/2.5 Stable3 w deny_info patch),
> the
> >>CPU utilization avg abt 80%. How do I lower the
> CPU
> >>utilization of my squid? Thanks.  
> >>
> >>Below is my machine specs:-
> >>
> >>Intel Xeon single-processor 2.4GHz(DELL 2650)
> >>2G physical RAM(w 2G swap under linux)
> >>2X 33G for everything except caching (mirror)
> >>3X 33G for caching (volume) 
> >>
> >>/dev/sda7               505605     68437    411064
> 
> >>15% /
> >>/dev/sda1               124427      9454    108549
>  
> >>9% /boot
> >>/dev/sdb1             35542688    201248  35341440
>  
> >>1% /cdata1
> >>/dev/sdc1             35542688    200888  35341800
>  
> >>1% /cdata2
> >>/dev/sdd1             35542688    200940  35341748
>  
> >>1% /cdata3
> >>/dev/sda3              1035692     49796    933284
>  
> >>6% /home
> >>none                   1032588         0   1032588
>  
> >>0% /dev/shm
> >>/dev/sda5              1035660    691648    291404
> 
> >>71% /usr
> >>/dev/sda6               505605     76236    403265
> 
> >>16% /usr/local
> >>/dev/sda8             29695892     83456  28103936
>  
> >>1% /var
> >>
> >>Below is my squid.conf(only the essential). 
> >>
> >>For ACL, basically I hv 3 acl list(in 3 separate
> >>files), one containing allowable IPs while the
> other
> >>contains deny IPs. I also hv 3 list of banned
> sites
> >>list(in 3 separate files).:-
> >>
> >>http_port 8080
> >>acl QUERY urlpath_regex cgi-bin \?
> >>no_cache deny QUERY
> >>cache_mem 400 MB
> >>cache_swap_low 92
> >>cache_swap_high 95
> >>maximum_object_size 2 MB
> >>maximum_object_size_in_memory 100 KB
> >>cache_replacement_policy heap GDSF
> >>memory_replacement_policy heap GDSF
> >>cache_dir aufs /cdata1 16000 36 256
> >>cache_dir aufs /cdata2 16000 36 256
> >>cache_dir aufs /cdata3 16000 36 256
> >>cache_access_log
> /var/log/cachelog/cache.access.log
> >>cache_log /var/log/cachelog/cache.log
> >>cache_store_log none
> >>quick_abort_min -1 KB
> >>acl all src 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0
> >>acl manager proto cache_object
> >>acl localhost src 127.0.0.1/255.255.255.255
> >>#3 banned list files
> >>acl SBA dstdomain "/usr/local/squid/etc/SBA.txt"
> >>acl CNB dstdomain "/usr/local/squid/etc/CNB.txt"
> >>acl CNB2 url_regex "/usr/local/squid/etc/CNB2.txt"
> >>#3 access list files
> >>acl NetTP src "/usr/local/squid/etc/NetTPsrc.acl"
> >>acl NetDeny src "/usr/local/squid/etc/deny.acl"
> >>acl NetAllow src "/usr/local/squid/etc/allow.acl"
> >>http_access deny SBA
> >>http_access deny CNB
> >>http_access deny CNB2
> >>http_access deny NetDeny
> >>http_access allow NetAllow
> >>http_access allow NetTP
> >>http_access deny all
> >>http_reply_access allow all
> >>cache_effective_user squid
> >>cache_effective_group squid
> >>logfile_rotate 10
> >>deny_info ERR_SBA_DENIED SBA
> >>deny_info ERR_CNB_DENIED CNB CNB2
> >>memory_pools off
> >>coredump_dir /var/log/cachelog
> >>
> >>Thanks again!
> >>
> >>Regards,
> >>Wolf
> >>
> >>
> >>__________________________________________________
> >>Do You Yahoo!?
> >>Send free SMS from your PC!
> >>http://sg.sms.yahoo.com 
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Send free SMS from your PC!
> >http://sg.sms.yahoo.com
> >
> >  
> >
> 
>  
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send free SMS from your PC!
http://sg.sms.yahoo.com
Received on Fri Aug 08 2003 - 11:36:29 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:18:47 MST