RE: [squid-users] reply_body_max_size causes squid to crash

From: Henrik Nordstrom <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 04:06:07 +0100 (CET)

the external acls probably won't work in reply_body_max_size unless you
have evaluated the same acls in http_access (and even then not entirely
reliably), but it should not crash.

Please get a stack trace from you crash and file a bug report, assuming
you are running the current STABLE release..

This is most likely related to the other reported crashes when using acls
based on ntlm authentication outside http_access.

Regards
Henrik

On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Anthony Boynes wrote:

> auth_param ntlm program /usr/lib/squid/wb_ntlmauth
> auth_param ntlm children 10
> auth_param ntlm max_challenge_reuses 5
> auth_param ntlm max_challenge_lifetime 15 minutes
> external_acl_type ntgroups %LOGIN /usr/lib/squid/wb_group
>
> acl unapproved dstdomain "/etc/squid/badsites" -i
> acl inetpartial external ntgroups InternetPartial
> acl inetfull external ntgroups InternetFull
> acl approved_ips src "/etc/squid/goodip"
>
> http_access allow approved_ips !unapproved
> http_access allow inetfull
> http_access allow inetpartial !unapproved
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:hno@squid-cache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 5:58 PM
> To: Anthony Boynes
> Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] reply_body_max_size causes squid to crash
>
>
> On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Anthony Boynes wrote:
>
> > reply_body_max_size 0 allow approved_ips
> > reply_body_max_size 0 allow inetfull
> > reply_body_max_size 0 allow inetpartial
>
> How are these acls defined?
>
> Regards
> Henrik
>
>
>
Received on Thu Nov 20 2003 - 20:06:17 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:21:28 MST