RE: [squid-users] Vary/Etag patch

From: Nimesh Shah <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 09:21:23 -0000

Hello,

Thank you for providing updated patch. While I have applied the
patch, there is some output that I would like to verify for any
improper behaviour (esp. some failures):

/usr/local/bin/patch -p1 < /tmp/etag-2.5.patch
(Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
patching file src/ETag.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n] y
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1.
File src/ETag.c is not empty after patch, as expected
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/ETag.c.rej
(Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
patching file src/HttpHeader.c
(Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
patching file src/HttpReply.c
(Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
patching file src/HttpRequest.c
(Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
patching file src/Makefile.am
(Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
patching file src/MemBuf.c
(Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
patching file src/String.c
(Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
patching file src/client_side.c
(Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
patching file src/defines.h
(Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
patching file src/enums.h
(Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
patching file src/ftp.c
(Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
patching file src/http.c
(Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
patching file src/mem.c
(Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
patching file src/protos.h
(Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
patching file src/store.c
Hunk #3 FAILED at 866.
1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/store.c.rej
(Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
patching file src/structs.h
(Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
patching file src/typedefs.h

Reg,
-Nimesh.#

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:hno@squid-cache.org]
> Sent: 26 November 2003 21:49
> To: Nimesh Shah
> Cc: 'Henrik Nordstrom'; squid-users@squid-cache.org
> Subject: RE: [squid-users] Vary/Etag patch
>
>
> Make sure to use GNU patch.. the solaris patch comand is not
> very good..
>
> As for the rejects the patch might need a little update..
> wait.. [computer
> thinking...] nothing obvious but attached to this message you
> can find a
> version of the etag-2.5 patch relative to current Squid-2.5
> sources (the
> same version will be on the web site in at most 24 hours)
>
> Regards
> Henrik
>
>
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Nimesh Shah wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Thank you once again.
> >
> > Unfortunately it seems to report errors:
> >
> > patch -p1 < /tmp/etag-2_5.patch
> > Looks like a unified context diff.
> > Hunk #1 failed at line 1.
> > 1 out of 1 hunks failed: saving rejects to src/ETag.c.rej
> > The next patch looks like a unified context diff.
> > The next patch looks like a unified context diff.
> > The next patch looks like a unified context diff.
> > The next patch looks like a unified context diff.
> > The next patch looks like a unified context diff.
> > The next patch looks like a unified context diff.
> > The next patch looks like a unified context diff.
> > The next patch looks like a unified context diff.
> > The next patch looks like a unified context diff.
> > The next patch looks like a unified context diff.
> > The next patch looks like a unified context diff.
> > The next patch looks like a unified context diff.
> > The next patch looks like a unified context diff.
> > The next patch looks like a unified context diff.
> > Hunk #3 failed at line 423.
> > 1 out of 3 hunks failed: saving rejects to src/store.c.rej
> > The next patch looks like a unified context diff.
> > The next patch looks like a unified context diff.
> > I can't seem to find a patch in there anywhere.
> >
> > Regards,
> > -Nimesh.
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:hno@squid-cache.org]
> > > Sent: 26 November 2003 21:18
> > > To: Nimesh Shah
> > > Cc: 'Henrik Nordstrom'; squid-users@squid-cache.org
> > > Subject: RE: [squid-users] Vary/Etag patch
> > >
> > >
> > > cd squid-2.5.STABLE4
> > > patch -p1 <../patch-file
> > > ./bootstrap.sh
> > >
> > > ./configure ...
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Henrik
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Nimesh Shah wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for quick response. I do have the patch
> > > > i.e. etag-2_5.patch. How is this to be applied (Solaris 2.8)?
> > > >
> > > > This does not seem to be sufficient:
> > > >
> > > > cd <squid exploded area>
> > > > patch -i <patch path/patch-file>
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > -Nimesh.
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:hno@squid-cache.org]
> > > > > Sent: 26 November 2003 18:30
> > > > > To: Nimesh Shah
> > > > > Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
> > > > > Subject: Re: [squid-users] Vary/Etag patch
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Nimesh Shah wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Do I still need to apply any more patches over this? If so
> > > > > where will I find
> > > > > > them? My interest is specific to support of "Vary" and
> > > > > "Etag" headers.
> > > > >
> > > > > Vary is supported by Squid-2.5.
> > > > >
> > > > > For ETag you need the ETag patch from
> > > http://devel.squid-cache.org/
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > > Henrik
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > ______________________________________________________________
> > > __________
> > > >
> > > > This e-mail message (including any attachment) is intended
> > > only for the personal
> > > > use of the recipient(s) named above. This message is
> > > confidential and may be
> > > > legally privileged. If you are not an intended recipient,
> > > you may not review, copy or
> > > > distribute this message. If you have received this
> > > communication in error, please notify
> > > > us immediately by e-mail and delete the original message.
> > > >
> > > > Any views or opinions expressed in this message are those
> > > of the author only.
> > > > Furthermore, this message (including any attachment) does
> > > not create any legally
> > > > binding rights or obligations whatsoever, which may only be
> > > created by the exchange
> > > > of hard copy documents signed by a duly authorised
> > > representative of Hutchison
> > > > 3G UK Limited.
> > > >
> > > ______________________________________________________________
> > > __________
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
> >
> > This e-mail message (including any attachment) is intended
> only for the personal
> > use of the recipient(s) named above. This message is
> confidential and may be
> > legally privileged. If you are not an intended recipient,
> you may not review, copy or
> > distribute this message. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify
> > us immediately by e-mail and delete the original message.
> >
> > Any views or opinions expressed in this message are those
> of the author only.
> > Furthermore, this message (including any attachment) does
> not create any legally
> > binding rights or obligations whatsoever, which may only be
> created by the exchange
> > of hard copy documents signed by a duly authorised
> representative of Hutchison
> > 3G UK Limited.
> >
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
> >
>
>

________________________________________________________________________

This e-mail message (including any attachment) is intended only for the personal
use of the recipient(s) named above. This message is confidential and may be
legally privileged. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not review, copy or
distribute this message. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
us immediately by e-mail and delete the original message.

Any views or opinions expressed in this message are those of the author only.
Furthermore, this message (including any attachment) does not create any legally
binding rights or obligations whatsoever, which may only be created by the exchange
of hard copy documents signed by a duly authorised representative of Hutchison
3G UK Limited.
________________________________________________________________________
Received on Thu Nov 27 2003 - 02:19:08 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:21:39 MST