Re: [squid-users] My Squid Hardware -- Any Tips/Advice Before It's Commissioned

 --- Peter Lustig <peter_lustig@gmx.de> wrote: > If
you don't need the support, I would also suggest
> to take a stable and
> heavily tested Debian Woody. With this one, you can
> always be sure to
> get security updates even in the not so close
> future. With SuSE you can
> not be sure to get updates in two years or later.

not sure i understand what you mean by this
statement..

>
> Some useful links (at least they were useful for
> me):
>
> Which filesystem to choose for the cache disks:
>
http://conferences.oreillynet.com/presentations/os2002/wessels_duane.ppt
>
> This article helped me a lot:
>
http://www.devshed.com/c/a/Administration/High-Performance-Web-Caching-With-Squid/2/

thanks, will definitely check these out...

>
>
>
>
> Besides that, I started with SuSE (7.0) too, but by
> getting more
> advanced it always was a pain in the ass when yast
> overwrote my manually
> edited configuration files.

well, that was a problem with SuSEconfig.. it has
since matured and doesn't give me any of those
problems nowadays..

i guess it's all about being there thru thick and
thin.. :)..

Regards,

Mark.

        
        
                
___________________________________________________________
WIN FREE WORLDWIDE FLIGHTS - nominate a cafe in the Yahoo! Mail Internet Cafe Awards www.yahoo.co.uk/internetcafes
Received on Thu Apr 01 2004 - 01:44:17 MST