Re: [squid-users] min-size for cache_dir ?

> On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > I'd like to split my squid spool to 2 filesystems: one large filesystem
> > with large block sizes for large files, other small filesystem with small
> > block sizes for small files.

On 02.04 23:29, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> Sound reasonable. Would allow for a large cache for large downloaded
> objects without exploding in memory usage due to a huge number of small
> objects being cached..

> > 2. define min-size option for cache_dir
...
> > I've looked at sources and I think min-size would be easy to implement...

> no harder than max-size.
>
> for both there will be some objects which are uncertain (where the full
> object size is not known before the complete object has been downloaded).

So, we have the question here: how is this problem solved now?

Also, are there any info how often (% of requests/responses) do we not
know the size of object before fetching them?

(just for info, I think if we can't know the size, we will just ignore the
min-size option)

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [email protected] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Fucking windows! Bring Bill Gates! (Southpark the movie)