Re: [squid-users] room for improvement in my proxy architecture

From: Henrik Nordstrom <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 21:13:23 +0200 (CEST)

On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Gaylord Van Brocklin wrote:

> The Squid -> AV server will be bypassing the firewall, but I guess I could
> throw another NAT box outside the AV servers.
>
> Is this a common solution to this problem?

I seen it done at many places requiring more than one proxy, for the exact
reasons you describe.

Other sites uses a proxy.pac file with a list of known troublesome sites
and redirecting these to a specific proxy solving the problem that way.

Others use a load balancing scheme where the same user will always use the
same proxy (unless unavailable).

Regards
Henrik
Received on Wed Oct 27 2004 - 13:13:26 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Mon Nov 01 2004 - 12:00:02 MST