RE: [squid-users] "aufs" vs "ufs"

I am feverishly looking for the link, but I read a fabulous article on
the 'Net that compared heap replacement algorithms and caching
filesystems. It was very involved and gave lots of benchmark data.
Anyone out there on the list got a link to it?

I would think that your hit/miss ratio and heap replacement is going to
have a great deal more effect upon peformance than switching from ufs to
aufs on a single platter. That said, I still consider myself a novice at
using Squid.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt [mailto:matt@fileholder.net]
> Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 10:42
> To: squid-users@squid-cache
> Subject: [squid-users] "aufs" vs "ufs"
>
> On a Squid cache with a single IDE drive under heavy load
> will switching from "ufs" to "aufs" improve performance? If
> so about how much?
>
> Matt
>
>
>
>
Received on Thu Nov 04 2004 - 09:00:02 MST