Re: [squid-users] is this related to bug id 528 ?

On 12/7/04 9:13 PM, "L. Jankok" <lj@2u2.nu> wrote:

>
> I wonder if the following is related to bug ID 528.
>
> I have a squid configuration with the following configuration;
>
> #
> acl stream dst 81.173.0.0/255.255.224.0
> acl stream dst 160.68.101.40/255.255.255.255
> acl stream dst 62.103.164.227/255.255.255.255
> acl stream dst 62.250.12.50/255.255.255.255
> acl stream dst 213.133.46.20/255.255.255.255
> acl stream dst 217.118.160.0/255.255.255.192
> acl stream dst 145.58.0.0/255.255.0.0
>
> ##
> ## The netcache app
> ##
> cache_peer 10.10.10.30 parent 3128 0 no-query proxy-only

This must be 10.11.30.24, which is also the case in the config

> #
>
> ##
> #
> cache_peer_access 10.11.30.24 allow stream
> cache_peer_domain 10.11.30.24 .rtl7.nl .vuurwerk.net .vuurwerk.nl
> .media002.is.nl .omroep.nl .garnierprojects.nl
> cache_peer_domain 10.11.30.24 .garnierprojects.com .rtl.nl .xs4all.nl
> .emptydirectoryradio.com .hollandmediagroep.nl
>
> What happens is pretty peculair. Although I try to catch the destinations
> using both their domain as the subnet
> they fall in, eventually some of those destinations will go to the default
> route instead of being forwarded to
> the netcache app.
>
> Could somebody shed some lights on this?.
>
> Regards,
>
> Lucio Jankok
Received on Tue Dec 07 2004 - 13:26:53 MST