Re: [squid-users] cache_dir slection criteria

From: Henrik Nordstrom <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 00:07:37 +0100 (CET)

On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Hendrik Voigtlaender wrote:

> I think I could solve my problem by using round-robin, which is pretty much
> self explaining. One question remains: What is squid's opinion of
> "least-load" ?

Depends on the cache_dir type.

For ufs it is the number of currently open files (squid-2.5.STABLE7,
earlier versions consider all equal load).

Fur aufs/diskd it is the number of pending operations within the
cache_dir.

Regards
Henrik
Received on Thu Dec 09 2004 - 09:53:18 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sat Jan 01 2005 - 12:00:02 MST