On Sat, 11 Dec 2004, Scott Phalen wrote:
> The odd thing is, there is no cache_peer or cache_peer_access directive
> telling squid2 or squid3 anything about squid1. I have been all over the
> configurations trying to figure out why 2 or 3 would send their data back to
> squid1. I am seeing "timeout_direct" lines in the access.log of both squid2
> and squid3. Could this by why they are querying squid1?
Are you sure you are looking into the correct squid.conf on your squid2 &
squid3?
You can only see TIMEOUT_DIRECT in access.log if you have ICP enabled
cache_peer:s defined (cache_peer:s not using the no-query option), and
requests only get forwarded to another peer if there is cache_peer
directives telling so should be done.
Regards
Henrik
Received on Sat Dec 11 2004 - 21:36:26 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sat Jan 01 2005 - 12:00:02 MST