RE: [squid-users] Failing to serve cached objects

From: Henrik Nordstrom <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 02:10:05 +0100 (CET)

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 johnsuth@acenet.com.au wrote:

> O'Reilly's Definitive Guide to HTML and XHTML has no reference in the index for either
> Expires or Cache-control, so why would any web page contain such information?

A web page wouldn't, but the HTTP response containing the HTML object/page
may.

> It looks like Squid will fail to serve most web pages. Is this a correct interpretation?

Squid follows the HTTP specifications on what may be cached, and quite
closely matches what the cacheability check engine reports.

You can tweak this in by the refresh_pattern setting.

With todays dynamic world a lot of pages is not cacheable due to being
dynamically generated by the web server on each request. Most linked
images, objects etc is cacheable however.

Regards
Henrik
Received on Wed Jan 26 2005 - 18:10:08 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Mon Mar 07 2005 - 12:59:36 MST