Re: [squid-users] Trying to Understand store.log

From: Marco Crucianelli <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 12:39:14 +0100

Il giorno mer, 09-03-2005 alle 12:20 +0100, Henrik Nordstrom ha scritto:
>
> On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, razidan wrote:
>
> > Hi! I'm trying to understand my store.log entries. I noticed that most of my
> > store.log action entries are RELEASE with some SWAPOUT. According to the FAQ
> > here: http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/FAQ-6.html#ss6.4 , RELEASE means
> > that the object was removed from cache.
>
> Yes...
>
> But also objects which were not cacheable is reported like this with the
> difference that they have no file number (FFFFFFFF).
>
> Regards
> Henrik

I've got the same problem, but playing with refresh_pattern (setting
something different from refresh_pattern . 0 20% 1440) I could get
many more SWAPOUT.
Isn't it too short setting 0 as minumum fresh time for an object without
expiry-time?!!? What would the best settings be?!!?

TIA

Marco
Received on Wed Mar 09 2005 - 04:37:11 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:00:02 MST