Re: [squid-users] caching too good?

Hi Ralf,

What are your refresh_patterns set to?

That site doesn't list expiry information, so it leaves it up to the cache
to decide. With default refresh_patterns, what you are seeing should not
be occurring for that site..

reuben

At 08:31 p.m. 11/03/2005, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>When I access
>http://homepage.mac.com/rossetantoine/osirix/Downloads.html directly,
>I get:
>
> 1 HTTP/1.0 200 OK
> 2 Accept-Ranges: bytes
> 3 Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 07:25:40 GMT
> 4 Content-Length: 6814
> 5 Content-Type: text/html
> 6 Connection: keep-alive
> 7 Server: Apache/1.3.33 (Darwin)
> 8 Last-Modified: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 08:54:40 GMT
> 9 ETag: "2e9e4d8-1a9e-42300b50"
>10 x-responding-server: web
>11 Via: 1.1 netcache06 (NetCache NetApp/5.5R4)
>
> From behind our Debian/testing squid 2.5.9-1 Proxies I get a very old
>page instead:
>
>1 HTTP/1.0 200 OK
>2 Accept-Ranges: bytes
>3 Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 15:58:42 GMT
>4 Content-Length: 7896
>5 Content-Type: text/html
>6 Server: Apache/1.3.33 (Darwin)
>7 Last-Modified: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 17:57:03 GMT
>8 ETag: "de7e69-1ed8-4213896f"
>9 x-responding-server: web
>10 Via: 1.1 netcache02 (NetCache NetApp/5.5R4)
>11 Age: 228519
>12 X-Cache: HIT from spiderboy.charite.de
>13 X-Cache-Lookup: HIT from spiderboy.charite.de:888
>14 Proxy-Connection: close
Received on Fri Mar 11 2005 - 00:55:34 MST