On 06.04 15:56, Kevin wrote:
> On a related note, how horrible is it to do the following to a
> Solaris-based cache server (aside from the obvious impact from wiping
> out the cache) ?
>
> su - squid -c 'squid -k shutdown'; sleep 31
you probably can do this as root without su-ing to squid user.
> umount /squid
> newfs -v -o space -m 1 -f 8192 /dev/rdsk/c1t1d0s0
> mount /squid
> su - squid -c 'squid -z && squid -s'
>
> Is it reasonable to use '-f 8192' to eliminate the fragmentation
> problem on Solaris through brute force?
I do not think so. Fragments are used to lower disk usage, with big
fragments you'll have to decrease your cache size (and that will decrease
your cache effectivity). The recommended solution of this problem does not
mention fragment size.
-- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [email protected] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. WinError #99999: Out of error messages.Received on Thu Apr 07 2005 - 01:34:48 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sun May 01 2005 - 12:00:03 MDT