RE: [squid-users] HTTPD reverse proxy

Joost,
If it's not a security secret, can you describe your alternative solution ?
 

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De�: Joost de Heer [mailto:sanguis@xs4all.nl]
> Envoy�: mercredi 12 octobre 2005 13:27
> ��: Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> Cc�: squid-users@squid-cache.org
> Objet�: Re: [squid-users] HTTPD reverse proxy
>
> > There's no reason for squid to forward request as https, unless the
> > network
> > between squid and server is untrusted. But in such case, there's usually
> > no
> > need for using squid.
>
> I disagree. For one customer, we provide reverse proxy functionality
> (although it's not Squid). The customer is divided into smaller fractions,
> some of which don't trust the rest. So they want the internal traffic to
> go via https too.
>
> Because the backend network is a private WAN, we do need the reverse proxy
> on the DMZ to publish the site.
>
> Joost
Received on Wed Oct 12 2005 - 05:37:55 MDT