Re: [squid-users] proxy_auth question

From: Mark Elsen <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 12:57:27 +0100

> Hi,
>
> I am trying to have users authenticate with our proxy but only for the
> purpose of logging their username to keep an eye on web access.
>
> My setup at the moment I have:
>
> SQUID (Non-caching and Authentication) -> Dansguardian -> SQUID (Full
> Caching)
>
> All on the same box. Authentication works perfectly and both squids are
> behaving as they should.
>
> Now I want to divert *all* our http requests through the squid box on
> the network, so I only want it to authenticate if it suceeds, if that
> makes sense.

No , that doesn't make sense, at all.

SQUID is designed to enforce auth. and then allow http access,
per installed rules.
There is no way to have access first, and then log a username.
Btw , who would stop anyonone, in such a condition, to log any username ?

Since apparently none-auth, does not have a penalty anymore in
your scheme ?

M.
Received on Tue Feb 21 2006 - 04:57:28 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wed Mar 01 2006 - 12:00:03 MST