Re: [squid-users] recommendation on file system for squid

From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 15:46:38 +0100

On 17.03.06 14:00, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> fre 2006-03-17 klockan 17:25 +0545 skrev arabinda:
>
> > Is there any specific recommendation on file system that aid the performance
> > of squid?
>
> noatime mount option.
>
> > Any suggestion?
>
> There isn't very big difference in performance between ext2 or reiserfs.
> ext3 generally also performs good but sometimes gives high latency for a
> short moment (probably while the log is flushed or something like that).

if you use reisersfs, use "notail" option.

many people recommend ext2 over ext3, but note that in case of power failure
the fsck can take ages.

It might be good idea to put journal on different device for all
journalling filesystems.

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [email protected] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
"Two words: Windows survives." - Craig Mundie, Microsoft senior strategist
"So does syphillis. Good thing we have penicillin." - Matthew Alton
Received on Fri Mar 17 2006 - 07:46:45 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sat Apr 01 2006 - 12:00:04 MST