> > Try switching to ext3 or xfs. If that helps you, it was reisersfs problem.
> > Also, you may try 2.6 kernel, but I'd try to switch to xfs first.
On 18.05.06 17:50, Edvard Chitro wrote:
> Which one is faster ? Ext2 or xfs ?
do NOT use ext2, unless you are prepared to wait for fsck or rebuild
filesystem (and loosing the cache) each time machine/power crashes.
> Ext3 is the slowest of all ...
no, there are slower filesystems, e.g. FAT32.
You can choose ext3, just use bigger commit interval (e.g. 30 secs).
Did you have disk performance problems? If not, don't say ext3 is the
slowest. It's STABLE.
-- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [email protected] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Chernobyl was an Windows 95 beta test site.Received on Fri May 19 2006 - 01:52:42 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 12:00:02 MDT