Re: [squid-users] Squid Doesn't Cache Some URLs, Does it Examine Content?

lör 2006-05-20 klockan 13:16 +0100 skrev Ralph Corderoy:
> Hi Mark,
>
> > > $ squidclient http://www.housepricecrash.co.uk/scripts/javascript/global.js |
> >
> > http://www.web-caching.com/cacheability.html
>
> Thanks, I'm having a look at it now. It appears broken however since it
> thinks "The following server's clock appears to be inaccurate" for any
> URL I throw at it, i.e. it's probably wrong, not the rest of the world.

There is other sites providing the same tool.

Home page: http://www.mnot.net/cacheability/

The ircache mirror runs with a correct clock..

> * http://www.housepricecrash.co.uk/scripts/javascript/global.js
> Date Sat, 20 May 2006 12:14:18 GMT
> Expires -
> Cache-Control -
> Last-Modified -
> ETag -
> Content-Length 0.5K (545)
> Server Apache/2.0.53 (Fedora)
>
> This object will be considered stale, because it doesn't have any
> freshness information assigned. It doesn't have a validator present.

Which is true and why it doesn't get cached. The clock issue is not
relevant under these conditions..

Regards
Henrik