> > do NOT use ext2, unless you are prepared to wait for fsck or rebuild
> > filesystem (and loosing the cache) each time machine/power crashes.
On 19.05.06 12:13, Edvard Chitro wrote:
> Power is really stable I have UPS ...
system can crash too, etc etc. do not use ext2, unless you are prepare to
wait for FSCK if that happens, or re-create the cache.
> From my practice Ext3 is really slow ... its just slow when there are a
> lot of small files in a directory .... even directory listing is slow ...
squid directory structure is made so problems from lots of files in
directory should not happen. squid tries to put only a few files into each
directory, that's why it has two-level subdirectory structure.
Also, ext2/ext3 has (now) option dir_index (see man tune2fs) which is used
to speed up file lookups in large directories. However I think that should
noe be needed because of squid directory structure, but you still may try.
> OK I will first try ext2 ... if it crashes then switch to ext3 ...
I asked you if you already do have performance problems.
If you dislike ext*, try xfs. I'd say it's more safe than reisersfs.
(actually, you can use reisersfs with "nolog" option to get some speed
more)
-- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [email protected] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. "One World. One Web. One Program." - Microsoft promotional advertisement "Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuhrer!" - Adolf HitlerReceived on Sun May 21 2006 - 02:30:18 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 12:00:02 MDT