Re: [squid-users] Best Caching Engine

From: Aaron Chu <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 15:40:56 -0700

I've also been looking at commercial caching products. What I've
found are:

squid - of course
netcache - appliances - they have a lot of large customers (yahoo,
myspace, etc) and their c2300 unit is priced at $20k
bluecoat - applicances - not too clear on their product line, but I
spoke with them and it seems their product is a player in the market
stratacache - servers with their own tuned OS and caching engine -
they have very large systems, but they seem like a very brute-force
approach (something like 48 disks in one chassis)
jaguar3000 - software - an off-shore company, with limited info online.

There are also a number of companies offering memory-based caching
products, which are limited to a few gigs of cache size. Caching is
also bundled into a lot of load balancers/traffic managers,
application servers, etc.

Aaron Chu

On May 26, 2006, at 3:07 PM, <lokesh.khanna@accelonafrica.com>
<lokesh.khanna@accelonafrica.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> Does anyone know which is the best (commercial or freeware) caching
> engine for Large ISP? Is there any comparison sheet between different
> cache engine?
>
> Thanks - LK
> Disclaimer
> **********************************************************************
> ******************************************************
> The information contained in this e-mail, any attached files, and
> response threads are confidential and
> may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of
> individual(s) or entity to which it is addressed
> and others authorised to receive it. If you are not the intended
> recipient, kindly notify the sender by return
> mail and delete this message and any attachment(s) immediately.
>
> Save as expressly permitted by the author, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or taking action in reliance
> on the contents of the information contained in this e-mail is
> strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
>
> Unless otherwise clearly stated, and related to the official
> business of Accelon Nigeria Limited, opinions,
> conclusions, and views expressed in this message are solely
> personal to the author.
>
> Accelon Nigeria Limited accepts no liability whatsoever for any
> loss, be it direct, indirect or consequential,
> arising from information made available in this e-mail and actions
> resulting there from.
>
> For more information about Accelon Nigeria Limited, please see our
> website at
> http://www.accelonafrica.com
> **********************************************************************
> ********************************************************
Received on Fri May 26 2006 - 16:42:11 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 12:00:02 MDT